Subscribe to my email list at subscribe@my-life-as-a-blog.com.

About Me

I have worked as a film publicist in NYC for 30 years.  This blog is the story of my life, as well as random thoughts on various topics.

My Life Was a Blog
Reid Rosefelt

Why I Cut Up My Citibank MasterCard

Monday, September 14, 2009

Cut-Card There was a Citibank MasterCard bill in my mailbox on Monday, August 31st,  When I took it upstairs and opened it I saw that I had been charged a $39.00 fee for late payment, plus some interest.  While checking my records showed that I thought I had paid the bill, going online proved that I hadn’t. Something probably distracted me.  Maybe the phone rang.  Anyway I plead guilty to not going on the site and making  the payment.  But I figured I was a good customer and I thought maybe they’d give me a break.  Here’s my record of payment to MasterCard, as provided by TransUnion--48 Months of payments made on time:

citibank-record-transunion

As I went through the various voice menus to find a human voice, the computer informed me that my credit card had been shut down and I was in big trouble.  As I had only found out about the problem a few minutes ago, and Citibank hadn’t made any attempt to reach me by email or phone, I thought this was kind of harsh.  So I wasn’t in a good mood when I finally was transferred to the calm out-sourced customer service rep.  He didn’t respond to my anger, and just told me  that my good payment record wasn’t an issue and in any case, all I had to do was go to the website, pay the bill and then call them back.  Citibank would refund the $39 penalty and any interest charges. When I got to the site, I saw this:

1-Your-Account-is-Past-Due On the next page were a series questions that I had to answer before Citibank would allow me to pay my bill

2-Reason-account-is-past-due2 Either I had to lie and say the statement wasn’t received or I was traveling (that’s an excuse?) or I had to say that I was in deep financial trouble.  Their point seemed to be that I could pay all my bills in full for four years (at least) until once I couldn’t come up with $20 for a minimum payment?

Here’s the next dropdown menu:

3-How-long-dropdown

As I was hoping to be allowed to pay the bill in a few minutes, I estimated that my current financial situation would last  0-6 months, although quite a bit closer to 0 months than to 6 months.

4-When-Do-you-estimate

As it was currently  8/31/2009, my ballpark estimation was that I could resume making my regular monthly payments in 08/2009.

5-What-source-of-funds I had to really study this one for a while. 401(k)?  Disability Checks?  Life Insurance Policy?  Liquidated Assets? Public Assistance? Student Loan?   I couldn’t put in “Paycheck,” as I’m a freelancer.   Even “Savings” seemed a bit dirty, like I was raiding my nest egg for a $20.00 minimum payment.

Finally, it looked like I was going to be able to set up my bank transfer and pay my bill.  But:

Your-Account-addl-fees

Wow!  I transfer money all the time, but I’ve never received a warning like this.  Any problem and they were going to assess me additional fees!  I was trying to pay them because they assessed me ridiculous fees.  But if there’s any hitch I would be assessed more ridiculous fees!  Worse, I would not be eligible to enroll in another plan. I assumed that by “plan” they meant a way to renegotiate my payments and get out of penury, but I could forget about anything like that if something went awry with my transfer from my Citibank Checking account to my Citibank MasterCard account. If there were any glitches, there might not be a second chance for me.  Soon I would have to sell my home and live in a van by the river.

I called again and went through the voicemail system again, until I reached someone who identified that the payment had been received and that I would be notified soon about my refunds.  And sure enough, when I checked my account online the next day:

6-Refund-Letter

Soon after that, the refunds were visible on my account!

7-Citibank-CreditsI got my $64.60 back!  It would seem that Citibank had accepted the notion that forgetting to make one minimum payment didn’t necessarily put you millimeters away from homelessness. But then I got this:

citibank-rate-letter3 This is a lie.  I had never inquired about them increasing my APR for a very good reason.  They had never told me about it before this.

It was time to break out the scissors. Citibank had finally convinced me--after over 35 years of using their card—to cut it up.   It felt good.  As you can see above, I recorded the occasion for posterity.   But then I got another email:PAPERLESSThat was it!   If you want to get email notifications from Citibank, you must face up to the “Sophie’s Choice”  of Paper versus Paperless Statement.  On one hand you have something that you generally receive and find handy for balancing your checkbook;  on the other hand is something that might go into your junk mail box.  But if you choose Paperless, from their point of view you would “eliminate the risk of statements being lost or stolen in the mail.,” and thus triggering their rip-off scams. But Paperless would be good for the environment and it makes me feel all toasty inside when I think about Citibank saving money on postage. Had I not cut up my card, what would I have done. I think $64.60 would have sealed the deal with me.  This was a protectionist racket for Paperless Statements: Give up your envelopes or empty out your pockets, muthah!

At this point you’re probably thinking that I have a lot of nerve kvetching about this.  Don’t I know that other people are getting really screwed by the credit card companies?  People who are actually in financial trouble?  But that’s the whole point.  Citibank and companies like them have brought this country down by their greed and incompetence, forcing us to bail them out with our tax money.  Now directly because of their actions and those of people like them,  people are losing their homes and their jobs.  So Citibank steps into the fray to steal money from the very people whose lives they have ruined.  But that isn’t sufficiently cruel for them.  They want to humiliate people too.  Where is the fun in pushing people to the ground if you can’t kick them too?

My understanding of  the credit card business today is that it operates like a partnership: one partner is a drunken driver that mows down pedestrians each day; the other one is an ambulance chasing lawyer pushing business cards into bloody hands.  Nice work if you can get it.

We-Want-Your-Feedback

To my friends at Citibank, thank you for asking for my feedback.  Here goes:

You are causing more harm and more agony and more destruction to America and our way of life than Al Qaeda ever has done and ever will.  You are traitors, and I don’t care how many congressmen you pay off so you can make your sociopathic attacks on America legal. 

I’m about as religious as Bill Maher, but this almost makes me want to be. Then I could believe that all of your executives would burn in the fires of hell for eternity.  That would be a start.

Have a nice day. 

 

Reid K Rosefelt
Chase Visa Cardholder in Good Standing

 

ADDENDUM. 

One more chapter in Citibank’s never-ending correspondence:

Balance Transfer

ARRRGGGGGGH!

Tags:

Comments (9) -

9/14/2009 6:35:55 AM #

Reid, I understand your frustration - and that's why I went paperless about a year ago. No more missed payments or late fees. My problem was a lazy, incompetent mail carrier who dropped my mail off at a neighbor's more often than not - and the US Postal Service seemed unable to correct the situation. My bills NEVER go into the spam folder. I can't really fault Citibank for what's happening in the credit market since many people are simply to paying their bills - for one reason or another. I guess I stayed with Citibank because of its many branches and because I get American Airlines frequent flyer miles.

Susan Granger | Reply

9/14/2009 7:18:17 AM #

It's not about my frustration, it's about the way that the credit cards have changed their business model from 1) commissions from merchants and 2) interest from people who carry balances to 3) creating booby-trap fees without providing clear information about them--it's all hidden inside fine print that nobody has the time to read. Recently there was the example of the kid who went from place to place buying things like a Starbucks Coffee and getting assessed a $60 fee each time.

There are hard times now and the people who feel it are the poor. And it is the poor who get hit by these scams.  I got a full refund for $65, but if I hadn't have been able to pay it instantly the interest fees would have gone on and on.   If I really had money problems and needed to carry a big balance I would probably would have paid hundreds for this error.  They would have kept loading on interest fees and raising the APR, making use of all kinds of rules that they don't publicize clearly.  People are paying 30% interest rates; you can probably get better terms from the mob. And this at a time when the prime is around 5%.

This kind of thing doesn't help the banks get money back from people who are walking away from their bills.  This kind of thing hits the people who are trying their hardest to pay their bills but are led into despair as they watch their balances grow exponentially despite all the money they send the banks. Also, if I was that kid, I'd start using cash. I'd be afraid of the card.  

Reid Rosefelt | Reply

9/14/2009 1:00:37 PM #

You may be more screwed than you think. There's a thing called "universal default," which essentially means that ANY of your cards could have their rates increased EVEN if you've never gone into default with that particular bank. That is, if Citibank reports that default to the credit reporting agencies, and other banks discover it, they can raise your rate on their cards. Here's the quick version from Wikipedia:
"Universal default is the term for a practice in the financial services industry for a particular lender to change the terms of a loan from the normal terms to the default terms (i.e. the terms and rates given to those who have missed payments on a loan) when that lender is informed that their customer has defaulted with another lender, even though the customer has not defaulted with the first lender."
Actually, Citibank has (according to Wikipedia) eliminated universal default from their accounts, but it's any other ones you have that you have to worry about.

I feel your pain, though. Several months ago a bank with which I had three accounts (hint: it rhymes with "Shase") decided to raise all card rates, nearly doubling them. I called them to find out why, at which point the rep told me I was an "increased risk." This is DESPITE never having been late with a payment, and paying more than the minimum payment every single time. This is despite that the job I have now (which I didn't have when they gave me the card) was more secure than my old one, and my salary had nearly doubled. He didn't seem to care. I finally said "look...you seem like a smart guy. If you keep this rate, I'm just going to transfer the balance to one of my cards with another bank, which has a much lower rate. So you can get the 9% of my (approx.) thousand bucks, or you can get 18% of nothing." Again, he didn't seem to care. So I thanked him, hung up, and immediately transferred the balance to another card (which DID have a much lower rate). Getting rid of your customers who pay? That just doesn't seem like a very smart practice.

BTW: About two months ago, they canceled two of the three cards. Funnily enough, they just happen to be the two with no balance.

Dead Serious | Reply

9/14/2009 1:33:24 PM #

I bet you're right. The APR on my Chase Card will probably go up too.  I wonder how high?  18 percent is already insane with 5 percent prime.  Thirty percent?  I guess I'll find out soon.

Reid Rosefelt | Reply

9/14/2009 1:37:55 PM #

You might get lucky, if Citibank doesn't report it to the CRAs, I don't think the others will find out, and if they credited you back the fees, perhaps they won't report it. I think a lot of the recent crap has to do with that new legislation that's taking effect soon. The banks are trying to get away with as much as they can (like arbitrarily raising rates) before it does.

Dead Serious | Reply

9/14/2009 1:39:32 PM #

I don't miss payments; in fact, I overpay every time (which doesn't make them especially happy, since they make more money when a customer pays only the minimum).  Nevertheless every card I have (4) is raising their interest rates and reducing my credit limits.  Google "rate jacking".  At the same time they offer me the option of remaining at my current rates if I opt to kill the card, which, they fail to mention, also shoots a big hole in my credit scores.  The banks, facing a looming change in legal avenues, have declared war on consumers, and if I had my druthers, the American consumer would call a strike on the banks.  Fuck me?  Fuck you.

HCBeck | Reply

9/14/2009 2:10:43 PM #

Bravo, Reid. I applaud the feedback comment you launched back at Citibank. These crazy times make anyone who's awake cuckoo. Don't even start me on the subject of health insurance...

Barbara | Reply

9/14/2009 6:45:28 PM #

Reid, this post was engaging and on point.  Unfortunately, we  have several cards, several cards too many is the real point, and it's hard to keep up with all the new changes they are forcing us to accept.  Wasn't legislation passed recently to prevent the credit card companies from ripping us off - a credit card consumer bill of rights.  I guess they are trying to pass through as many increases as possible before it is go into effect.

Brenda | Reply

9/14/2009 7:00:56 PM #

Well there was a bill that passed the house but it has not gotten through the Senate.  Chris Dodd is the head of the banking committee and he got four million dollars from the banking industry for his last election. That's what a lot of people say--they are getting very aggressive now.  Rate Jacking.

Reid Rosefelt | Reply

Add comment




  Country flag
biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading